Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. After the Revolution, America became determined to shorten words to simplify them as much as possible (part of the reason the letter u was removed from words like “colour” and why “z” often replaced “s”), which is why over there “weird” is always said quite short. In other places, such as England and Australia, the word is often still drawn out very slightly so it almost has a second syllable. This is a remnant of when it was always pronounced with two syllables – the second syllable is still very prominent with a Scottish accent because of how the r is rolled. Especially now in the days of the keyboard, both forms of this diacritic tend to be omitted for simplicity when writing or printing English.

Stack Exchange Network

There are a huge number of alternative noun phrases for this sense, based on what terminology is used for the spacecraft in question (for example ‘shuttle pilot’). When it needs to be unambiguous, this sense is usually called a ‘ship pilot’ or ‘maritime pilot’. Basically the answer is that naïve is sometimes spelled with the diaresis because it is derived from French which spells it that way.

• As with most things in English, no, there isn’t a general rule.
• It’s pronounced “coh-op….” and not to rhyme with “loop”.
• With or without the commas, it’s unambiguous and completely understandable.
• In this case the difference in meaning is subtle, and not very significant.

Similarly, in the expression a Greek Orthodox priest, “Greek Orthodox” forms a unit that we cannot separate or change the order of; so no comma can be used between “Greek” and “Orthodox.” The aviation industry directly borrowed the term from the maritime industry (and, originally on larger aircraft, did the same with term navigator). When it needs to be unambiguous, this sense is usually called an ‘aircraft pilot’, though it may be further qualified by the type of aircraft the pilot normally flies (for example ‘fighter pilot’, ‘cargo pilot’, or ‘bomber pilot’). Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. I think that whether or not the female -ess noun is used just depends on whether or not native speakers use that word frequently in the language. If they don’t, then they use the male noun for both genders.

Why does the i in “naïve” have two dots?

Another example is “cooperative” where the second “o” in theory has a dieresis. It’s pronounced “coh-op….” and not to rhyme with “loop”. Again, I’ve never written it with the dieresis, and don’t recall seeing it like that either. Doing good for someone means that they are an indirect recipient of the benefit of your action. For example, if someone is hungry and you give money to a charity that provides food. Result is more commonly used in regular conversation, and is most appropriate in referring to what are the effects of some actions.

What’s the difference between ‘aviator’ and ‘pilot’?

So “the result of your diligent study was a good grade on the test.” Aviator is now a more old https://pinupgame.in/ fashioned term for pilot.

Why does the i in “naïve” have two dots?

It’s used to show that the “a” and the “i” are not to be pronounced as a single sound. So it’s pronounced something like “na-eve” and not like “knave” or with the “ai” rhyming with the “i” in “knives”. Doing good by somone means that their situation may be improved as a consequence of your actions (so your actions are guided by a respect for their situation).

The general rule is that commas should be used to separate two or more adjectives that independently modify a noun. In more technical terms, commas are used between two or more “coordinate” adjectives that modify the same noun–“co-ordinate” in that they equally/independently modify the noun. Here’s my understanding of the suffix ess. I, personally, would assume the suffix ess fits well with titles given to a person of nobility. There are some exceptions that I’ve read. It probably comes down to what is pleasing to the listener.

• The vast majority of English keyboards don’t even contain a modifier to add a diaresis (or a tilde, accent, or any other marking, for that matter) to a letter.
• “The pilot” is the person in direct chrage of flying the aircraft.
• This is because both “long”, “straight”, and “black” apply to the noun “hair” equally, regardless of order.
• For example, if someone is hungry and you give money to a charity that provides food.

Stack Exchange Network

For example, knowing that someone is hungry you resolve not to waste food or to campaign for restaurants to provide surplus food to a charity. With or without the commas, it’s unambiguous and completely understandable. In such a simple, unambiguous sentence it’s almost more readable without the commas though.

This gave the word two syllables, “wei” and “ird”. When in doubt, use result because it implies the least. When you want to imply something negative, or potentially negative, use consequence. Reserve outcome for formal, technical discussions. As another example, the result of raising prices might be higher profit margins, but the outcome of a pricing strategy may be less profit from a reduced number of sales.

Native speakers probably use 1 more than 2 in such a situation, at least in my experience, but that is a matter of style. There is a slight different in emphasis, but in both cases the point of there being past due orders is made. Use which ever feels best to you, or fits the rest of your message best.

I would leave out the redundant “got” and just say “I have long, straight, black hair.” However, the use of the word “got” implies a more colloquial rendition, so I would not be totally against the non-comma version. While all of these people were pilots (and some still are), many are also noted for contributions in areas such as aircraft design and manufacturing, navigation or popularization.

The word actor is a gender neutral word that defines an occupation. I, personally, wouldn’t feminize any words that are gender neutral. As with most things in English, no, there isn’t a general rule. Some words in -er have feminine counterparts in -ress.1 And most words that end with -man can be feminized by changing it to -woman. But for any given word, the only way to tell whether such a feminized version exists is to look it up in the dictionary. In other words, you can’t really go about creating feminine equivalents of random occupational words; you can merely use feminine equivalents, if they exist.

The situation with long straight black hair is a little more complicated. It would not necessarily be incorrect to include one or two commas in this list of adjectives (as either “long, straight, black hair” or “long, straight black hair”), but in this particular situation, it is largely a matter of personal stylistic preference. If we switch it to She had a mobile new phone or She had a new and mobile phone, the meaning would be completely different. So in this case, the adjectives are NOT coordinate adjectives, and a comma should NOT be used. We cannot separate “mobile” from “phone” because the “mobile phone” forms a unit that “new” is modifying.

Such as “farmer” becomes “farmerette” and “wolf” becomes “she-wolf”. This is because both “long”, “straight”, and “black” apply to the noun “hair” equally, regardless of order. I think the usage of these female nouns may be idiomatic. Idiomatic means that there is no firm grammar rule and you have to learn each one on a case-by-case basis. “The pilot” is the person in direct chrage of flying the aircraft.

Words with distinctly feminine forms are usually old. Words that signify an occupation that formerly was exclusively male, or didn’t exist in earlier times, seldom have feminine forms, and indeed, the use of feminine forms (even if they do exist) is dying out. Personally I like the two comma version the best, of the ones given. Coordinating adjectives, which these are, should be separated by commas. Also, it coincides with normal conversational rhythm. It is, however, rare to hear people in the third category referred to as “aviators.” They meet the dictionary definition, and Wikipedia includes them, but in a separate list at the bottom of the page because they get in on a technicality.